16 August 2022: UK Changes Their Guidelines On Vaccination Of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women To Withdraw Vaccination Recommendations, And To Recommend Pregnancy Screening Prior To Vaccination!

Philippine Obstetrical And Gynecological Society (POGS) maintain their 22nd January 2022 Practice Bulletin for full Covid-19 vaccination and booster doses for pregnant and breastfeeding women!

Today I have seen a message in an Australian friends group regarding a fully Covid-19 vaccinated woman who has just found out, at 6 months pregnant that her baby has no ribs or skull. This is subsequent to another post in the same group this week of a memorial for a baby inexplicably lost at 41 weeks. There are many reports of infertility, pregnancy losses post jab, and severe birth defects privately within my local social network, but I have not found anything discussed outside of alternative media, publicly.

Is something up with menstrual health, fertility, pregnancy, live births?

The finding of severe birth defects and pregnancy losses may not be so surprising when we consider the recently revealed study data from Moderna showing that vaccinated rats had offspring showing rib malformations. The same article also discusses malformations in offspring of Pfizer treated rats.

Then there are the pregnancy losses during the Pfizer trials, that were covered up, and with most outcomes from women who became pregnant unreported.

Daily Clout (Naomi Wolf): "Forty-Four (44%) Percent of the Pregnancies in a Pfizer Study Ended in Miscarriages. Pfizer Misleadingly Reclassified Them

Then there is the whistle blowing of Australian fertility specialist Dr. McLindon who lost his job over attempts to reporting massive increases in pregnancy losses, and who is now going public; I will share links in coming days as the story develops. HERE is the presentation by Dr. McLindon!

VAX_DANGER (2022-08-22) SPECIAL: Just out today. Dr. McLindon interview. [killJAB]

Women know that menstrual health is a prime indicator of both their overall health and their fertility. In June of 2021 bleeding in menopausal women was reported in Canada. Israeli women were also pleading for attention to menstrual changes. Menstrual changes post covid-19 vaccination hit the mainstream news in June 2022, a year later, in a Science Advances article, though the authors concluded that changes are not uncommon or dangerous. Recently, “I am the Science Fauci” has offhandedly dismissed it as “that menstrual thing”. All of this raises the alarm for women who know that being brushed off and dismissed is the first sign that something is really seriously wrong!

Then there is the breaking news worldwide about plummeting birthrates in 2022. Even while mainstream media claim naivety on cause, alternative media are squarely linking dropping births, SADS, and excess deaths with Covid-19 vaccination.

In the Philippines we do not yet have data to evaluate if there are any impacts on birth rates; impacts that would become apparent in the 2022 2nd and 3rd quarter live birth registrations data, none of which have yet been released. Pregnancy losses, still births, and early post-natal deaths are only reported a year after the close of each year (2021 should be available within January 2023 if they follow previous releases).

UK Withdraws Recommendation of Vaccination of Pregnant Women

What do we make of the just released last 16 August 2022, UK Public Assessment Report withdrawing the recommendation for the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy and breastfeeding? The report claims the withdrawal is made in an abundance of caution rather than based on any evidence. However, why did they make that recommendation now, instead of adopting caution since the beginning of the rollout.

The UK report makes for very interesting reading, particularly with regards to all the studies that have (still) not been done, more than 2 years since these products first started human trials. If you don’t ask, you won’t know, and you can’t tell!

The UK Report references WHO 2005, a 17 year old document on vaccine testing standardization that makes no mention of lipid nano-particles and mRNA. It does however caution on page 31, that there are scientific and regulatory challenges with novel products and adjuvants! This is surely relevant to Pfizer and the mRNA products! It seems that they carefully pick and choose which sections of the document they want to be relevant?

And on Page 33, that more extensive testing is required for novel products:

Back to pregnancy and breastfeeding. The Pfizer vaccine is no longer recommended for pregnant and breastfeeding women in the UK, and healthcare professionals are recommended to rule out pregnancy prior to vaccination.

Covid-19 Vaccination for Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women in the Philippines

These latest UK recommendations run counter to both US and Philippines current guidelines which are both strongly in favor of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding:

AJOG (American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology), in their 11 May 2022 Expert Review laments vaccine hesitancy among pregnant people, and states that “unrestricted access to Covid-19 vaccination should be a priority in every country worldwide”.

The Philippines Obstetrical and Gynecological Society (POGS) follows the American guidelines. The POGS latest Practice Bulletin, last updated 13th January 2022, promotes the use of Covid-19 Vaccines and boosters in all stages of pregnancy and in breastfeeding women.

Key points are extracted from the statement:-

Women who refuse a Covid-19 vaccine are to be counselled and reoffered the vaccines at subsequent appointments.

Who is right? The UK, or the US and the Philippines (and everyone else still pushing these jabs for everyone under all conditions)?

Generational Wisdom Has Been Forgotten

It used to be that pregnancy was the time for utmost caution about everything that went into and onto a woman’s body! It was known that many substances, even those believed to be benign could affect outcomes and the health of the developing baby. When I studied pharmacology our lecturers repeatedly emphasized the necessity of an excess of caution in preparation for and during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Why have we forgotten our innate wisdom? Why aren’t doctors and people reporting adverse outcomes being taken seriously. Where there is smoke there is usually fire. We already have a firestorm, and it is about to explode!

In light of the international trending and emerging concerns with reproductive health and fertility outcomes, it may well be time for an update of guidelines truly erring on the side of caution!