Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andreas's avatar

Thanks Sally. For doing the number crunching.

You know what they say about statistics.

Numbers can be made to mean anything. And the ABS seem about as impartial as the FBI.

However, we all know people who have died long before they 'should' have. ~50k of our brothers and sisters have been murdered by the State. With countless more sickened.

And our politicians sought to avoid looking into it for as long as they could.

If that isn't a declaration of war against our people, I don't know what is.

Democide is the other word that perfectly fits what they are specifically doing to older people. But injecting that bioweapon into anyone should be seen as attempted murder - there is more than enough evidence of lethal harms, and no evidence whatsoever of benefit.

Peace.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

Thank you. I would argue that the pull-through effect is bigger than the trending effect, making the trending adjustment not only unnecessary but also misleading. Excess death should be followed by fewer deaths resulting in the a slight trending increase. The timing of the pull-through effects is very age dependent and morbidity dependent. We have never faced a health crisis that has affected so many young and healthy people.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts