Forcing jabs, ignoring science, ignoring injuries and deaths! Then there is Senator Robert's Spectator Article on plummeting births. We have the innate power to change the world! We do it now!
People are waking up. I read an article this morning on FB about Ricky Ponting being hospitalised in Perth. The comments were amazing. 95% of the comments had something to say regarding the toxic jabs. One sheeple trying to defend their position. Go Senator Rennick. You are a God send. As for the pollies laughing at him and his questions etc. Your time will come. There are a lot of people dying suddenly in their sleep. You should be very afraid of going to sleep. Karma is coming!
A 2005 study on mice had a control group and a group with mild myocarditis. After 120 days (quite a long time for a mouse), they injected them with adrenalin. 70% of the myo mice died! 0% died in the control group. Cortisol is also a stress hormone, and is similar to adrenalin, which could explain the heart related deaths while sleeping (or more likely waking up).
Japanese Professor Calls Out the Covid "Vaccine" BS.
Exactly two years later and the Japanese “scientists” start questioning the gene therapy’s purpose. Where were they in December 2020 when the poisons were being rolled out without scientific evaluation?
This section of the above article may need some clarification and teasing out:
"Unvaccinated persons fare better for hospital and ICU than all dosing levels. Unvaccinated apparently have higher deaths than 3rd and 4th dosed persons. This may reflect that the deaths reported as with Covid-19 are primarily in the very elderly and persons with severe comorbidities,"
It seems that you could be conceding that the 'vaxers' have a point.
There was some indication that the initial series (only) of these vaccines did provide some protection against deaths directly from Covid-19 infection, particularly for the early variants, for those persons at very high risk of death from covid-19 infection. However, somewhat lower deaths from covid-19 hasn't taken into account the soaring excess deaths from non-covid causes that have occurred since jabs rollout. 25% excess deaths in elderly Australian men, nearly 20% excess deaths in elderly Australian women. The risk benefit is heavily weighted to the risk side. Any death prevention from covid-19 (for very high risk populations only) is totally lost with boosters.
Thank you, Sally. So I understand. But, to my layman's way of thinking, the statement that the "Unvaccinated apparently have higher deaths than 3rd and 4th dosed persons" still works against your (our) argument. I hope I am not being pernickety. I just don't understand. If the vaccines are not "safe and effective" then surely the "Unvaccinated ... [would not] have higher deaths [from Covid or vaccine injury] than 3rd and 4th dosed persons"? Or are you suggesting that these "Unvaccinated" are dying non-Covid deaths and yet are dying at a higher rate than "3rd and 4th dosed persons"? We are confronting, perhaps, a conundrum here.
OK. Now that is very interesting. I reckon that the unfolding of those data indications will reveal something very interesting about what were the age and medical condition of the unvaccinated. Many thanks, Sally.
I think it is important to be accurate in our statements and in discussing data. The deaths really shower higher apparent covid-19 deaths in unvaccinated compared to first 2 doses. It works against us only if one looks at that single aspect... but we must take a broader view and recall that only the very old and already sick were at risk from covid. All of the data has been skewed by the reporting of all the deaths with Covid-19 deaths as if they were from. The dangers of these jabs is becoming more apparent by the day. The danger from covid19 though shrinks... less than a regular flu....
Thank you, Sally. I agree: "it is important to be accurate in our statements and in discussing data. "
So, are we have dealing here with a phenomenon of elderly unvaxed people dying "with Covid" who might well have died of other causes or just being old?
Certainly this is the case. Most of those dying with covid are beyond life expectancy, and or with severe comorbidities and expected limited remaining lifespan. This has been the case from the beginning. Plandemic! However, they had to label everything from covid to maintain fear and compliance. Never mind that respiratory illness deaths are well within normal ranges (as observed in Australian and Philippines data - US was different; their hospital protocols were actively killing patients...)... meaning these people could just as well have died with flu, or pneumonia, or a UTI, or something else....
People are waking up. I read an article this morning on FB about Ricky Ponting being hospitalised in Perth. The comments were amazing. 95% of the comments had something to say regarding the toxic jabs. One sheeple trying to defend their position. Go Senator Rennick. You are a God send. As for the pollies laughing at him and his questions etc. Your time will come. There are a lot of people dying suddenly in their sleep. You should be very afraid of going to sleep. Karma is coming!
A 2005 study on mice had a control group and a group with mild myocarditis. After 120 days (quite a long time for a mouse), they injected them with adrenalin. 70% of the myo mice died! 0% died in the control group. Cortisol is also a stress hormone, and is similar to adrenalin, which could explain the heart related deaths while sleeping (or more likely waking up).
Japanese Professor Calls Out the Covid "Vaccine" BS.
Exactly two years later and the Japanese “scientists” start questioning the gene therapy’s purpose. Where were they in December 2020 when the poisons were being rolled out without scientific evaluation?
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/12/01/japanese-prof-fukushima-calls-out-the-covid-vaccine-bs/
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/professor-emeritus-at-kyoto-university/comments#comment-10827934
Dear Sally,
This section of the above article may need some clarification and teasing out:
"Unvaccinated persons fare better for hospital and ICU than all dosing levels. Unvaccinated apparently have higher deaths than 3rd and 4th dosed persons. This may reflect that the deaths reported as with Covid-19 are primarily in the very elderly and persons with severe comorbidities,"
It seems that you could be conceding that the 'vaxers' have a point.
Gary S
There was some indication that the initial series (only) of these vaccines did provide some protection against deaths directly from Covid-19 infection, particularly for the early variants, for those persons at very high risk of death from covid-19 infection. However, somewhat lower deaths from covid-19 hasn't taken into account the soaring excess deaths from non-covid causes that have occurred since jabs rollout. 25% excess deaths in elderly Australian men, nearly 20% excess deaths in elderly Australian women. The risk benefit is heavily weighted to the risk side. Any death prevention from covid-19 (for very high risk populations only) is totally lost with boosters.
Thank you, Sally. So I understand. But, to my layman's way of thinking, the statement that the "Unvaccinated apparently have higher deaths than 3rd and 4th dosed persons" still works against your (our) argument. I hope I am not being pernickety. I just don't understand. If the vaccines are not "safe and effective" then surely the "Unvaccinated ... [would not] have higher deaths [from Covid or vaccine injury] than 3rd and 4th dosed persons"? Or are you suggesting that these "Unvaccinated" are dying non-Covid deaths and yet are dying at a higher rate than "3rd and 4th dosed persons"? We are confronting, perhaps, a conundrum here.
Gary S (happily and doggedly unvaxed)
I also corrected my write up. Unvaccinated had higher deaths than 1st and 2nd dosed. But lower than 3rd and particularly 4th dosed.
OK. Now that is very interesting. I reckon that the unfolding of those data indications will reveal something very interesting about what were the age and medical condition of the unvaccinated. Many thanks, Sally.
I think it is important to be accurate in our statements and in discussing data. The deaths really shower higher apparent covid-19 deaths in unvaccinated compared to first 2 doses. It works against us only if one looks at that single aspect... but we must take a broader view and recall that only the very old and already sick were at risk from covid. All of the data has been skewed by the reporting of all the deaths with Covid-19 deaths as if they were from. The dangers of these jabs is becoming more apparent by the day. The danger from covid19 though shrinks... less than a regular flu....
Thank you, Sally. I agree: "it is important to be accurate in our statements and in discussing data. "
So, are we have dealing here with a phenomenon of elderly unvaxed people dying "with Covid" who might well have died of other causes or just being old?
Certainly this is the case. Most of those dying with covid are beyond life expectancy, and or with severe comorbidities and expected limited remaining lifespan. This has been the case from the beginning. Plandemic! However, they had to label everything from covid to maintain fear and compliance. Never mind that respiratory illness deaths are well within normal ranges (as observed in Australian and Philippines data - US was different; their hospital protocols were actively killing patients...)... meaning these people could just as well have died with flu, or pneumonia, or a UTI, or something else....
Thank you, Sally, for taking the time to discuss my question.
GS
Thank you SS for this.
Interesting that world over, there are quite a few politicotards peeping over the parapets, & calling out their own Govtards.
Well done each & every one of them.
Hi Sally, please be sure to read Karen Kingstons Substack today on the bio weapon. Centre of target! 🎯