Australia is a perfect case study on vaccine failure. Their cases only exploded once a majority of the population was jabbed. Now they have waves of infection concentrated in the multiply jabbed.
Have you checked the percentage unvaccinated? Neil Fenton shows Britain has 20% unJabbed that greatly affects the interpretation of public health stats.,
I would easily have 20% of my friends unvaccinated
Australia officially has about 83% of people jabbed for primary protocols. They also target everyone from 6 months up now. Of course those of us who don't take the jabs may also end up networking with people of similar interests and inclinations. Among my precovid 19 close friends, I only know of 2 people who didnt take these products. Luckily most of my immediate family didnt take them. I have many new friends now. Our perspectives may be skewed by those we associate with.
I can accept that; in rural areas higher because many unJabbed went to rural areas to escape the tyranny and those on farms, in the building trades etc really didn’t need it to work.. those unJabbed still face ridiculous discrimination .. sitting with two atm..
Agree with associations bias ing our world view, of my work colleagues only one refused entirely, I had only one jab...and was about to quit when they dropped the mandates, however I attend a church where at least 40% really didn’t want the jab but half of them were coerced by mandates.. so a good 20% remain unJabbed... they are pretty mixed bunch, often wives don’t have to have it.. prior to Covid I was very pro vac... very trusting of medicine.. I have been surprised just who has objected.. it largely falls to where they get information from..
Yes they could, however, in this case the data shows the un-jabbed just die without getting sick first or admitted into hospital consistently. Are we supposed to believe they mostly died suddenly.
Thanks heaps for the work you do bringing this very important and crucial date for all to see.
May i please speak a little on the bias perspectives you referred to above.
Something is definitely not adding up with the NSW data.
The un-jabbed have a 6-months history of no event- both with hospital and ICU admission compared to the jabbed but when it comes to deaths the un-jabbed are way higher than the one and two doses. PLEASE MAKE THAT MAKE SENSE....
That means the unjabbed don't get sick enough to be admitted or deathly sick to be in ICU but yet they just drop dead, how where, when???.
Before gene therapy was introduced, at what rate were people dying in the hospital compared to in their homes. Last time i checked it was 98% and 2% in the UK respectively. NSW would be far less than that considering the "excellent healthcare system" that Australia as a country enjoyed. So, yeah!!! the death data does not make sense.
Someone in the DOH is covering their backsides so as to keep the herd from WAKING UP, after all we need to show them the JAB IS WORKING IN SOME AREA...even though it failed with infection, transmission, hospitalisation, it certainly passed with flying colours when it came to DEATHs...
The deaths in the unjabbed could be made up... in that these are people who refused jabs, and then died of something else, or even old age. Used to make up numbers to keep people scared. The average age of death is still high... or they could have been too unwell to to take a jab (though I don't see that they hesitate in that basis).. Agree the death data doesnt make sense.
A 5th wave that is caused by the vaccinated infecting the vaccinated with their self-incubated variants because their damaged immune systems "cannot" clear Covid from their bodies. This is going to continue until most of them expire from this or some other horrible adverse vaccine reaction/disease.
Love you guys
Have you checked the percentage unvaccinated? Neil Fenton shows Britain has 20% unJabbed that greatly affects the interpretation of public health stats.,
I would easily have 20% of my friends unvaccinated
Australia officially has about 83% of people jabbed for primary protocols. They also target everyone from 6 months up now. Of course those of us who don't take the jabs may also end up networking with people of similar interests and inclinations. Among my precovid 19 close friends, I only know of 2 people who didnt take these products. Luckily most of my immediate family didnt take them. I have many new friends now. Our perspectives may be skewed by those we associate with.
I can accept that; in rural areas higher because many unJabbed went to rural areas to escape the tyranny and those on farms, in the building trades etc really didn’t need it to work.. those unJabbed still face ridiculous discrimination .. sitting with two atm..
Agree with associations bias ing our world view, of my work colleagues only one refused entirely, I had only one jab...and was about to quit when they dropped the mandates, however I attend a church where at least 40% really didn’t want the jab but half of them were coerced by mandates.. so a good 20% remain unJabbed... they are pretty mixed bunch, often wives don’t have to have it.. prior to Covid I was very pro vac... very trusting of medicine.. I have been surprised just who has objected.. it largely falls to where they get information from..
keep up your work and thanks..
Yes they could, however, in this case the data shows the un-jabbed just die without getting sick first or admitted into hospital consistently. Are we supposed to believe they mostly died suddenly.
Something is very fishy with the death data...
Thanks heaps for the work you do bringing this very important and crucial date for all to see.
May i please speak a little on the bias perspectives you referred to above.
Something is definitely not adding up with the NSW data.
The un-jabbed have a 6-months history of no event- both with hospital and ICU admission compared to the jabbed but when it comes to deaths the un-jabbed are way higher than the one and two doses. PLEASE MAKE THAT MAKE SENSE....
That means the unjabbed don't get sick enough to be admitted or deathly sick to be in ICU but yet they just drop dead, how where, when???.
Before gene therapy was introduced, at what rate were people dying in the hospital compared to in their homes. Last time i checked it was 98% and 2% in the UK respectively. NSW would be far less than that considering the "excellent healthcare system" that Australia as a country enjoyed. So, yeah!!! the death data does not make sense.
Someone in the DOH is covering their backsides so as to keep the herd from WAKING UP, after all we need to show them the JAB IS WORKING IN SOME AREA...even though it failed with infection, transmission, hospitalisation, it certainly passed with flying colours when it came to DEATHs...
The deaths in the unjabbed could be made up... in that these are people who refused jabs, and then died of something else, or even old age. Used to make up numbers to keep people scared. The average age of death is still high... or they could have been too unwell to to take a jab (though I don't see that they hesitate in that basis).. Agree the death data doesnt make sense.
A 5th wave that is caused by the vaccinated infecting the vaccinated with their self-incubated variants because their damaged immune systems "cannot" clear Covid from their bodies. This is going to continue until most of them expire from this or some other horrible adverse vaccine reaction/disease.
Sadly yes. Every infection acts like another booster dose.
How are people still not able to see this when the official data is so clear?
Here is a video that might explain some of it. WHY DID SO MANY SUPPOSEDLY INTELLIGENT PEOPLE FALL FOR THE NONSENSE? https://www.bitchute.com/video/M8Yqr6n3u7XR/