New Zealand Data FOI Release Shows Devastating Outcomes for The Vaccinated. Even Worse, While Regular Folks Were Essentially Given No Choice, 11,000 Politicians and Elite were Given Jab Exemptions.
New Zealand Data FOI Release Shows Devastating Outcomes for The Vaccinated. Even Worse, While Regular Folks Were Essentially Given No Choice, 11,000 Politicians and Elite were Given Jab Exemptions.
Huge spike of Deaths Following Dose 1. Sharing FOI breaking news: the NZ Whistleblower is more than vindicated. Shame on all the politicians! You killed your own people and covered it up!
96% of the eligible population (12 years old and above) were persuaded and coerced into taking the injections. New Zealand was especially punitive towards those in the genera population refusing the jabs. Politicians of course had a get out of jail free card. The safe and effect propaganda continues, but this release of data must surely be one of the keystones in the dam wall that spells the end of this coverup. History will not look kindly on the events of the last 4 years.
Maybe the recently changed government in NZ is allowing this to come out! One of the countries that was most ravaged, has fallen the furtherest, is now showing the way!
I'm a little confused. The FOI that sought vaccination history for those who were hospitalised, or died after the vaccination roll out has been denied by the NZ MOH. My own research using Stats NZ data shows an increase in deaths, using 2020 as the datum, for the months and years following the injection roll-out, in normally low death-rate months, the warmer months, but a reduction in death rates in the winter, following these higher death rate months. This makes sense as anyone can only die once..
Future maps of the world show New Zealand as one of the safe places in the coming pole shift/cataclysms. That's why so many Deep State have built bunkers there. That's why genociding the native Maori and other New Zealanders will allow for a massive land grab (no more descendants to claim ancestral or other titled lands).
If the spikes were simply the injections selecting old people already most likely to die, then you would expect the black unvaccinated line to mirror the coloured lines and go way below zero representing young people left who aren't susceptable to death. They don't. To me, the virtually horizontal black line is a major tell given the presence of the spikes.
Fiona Barnett says Leonas Petrauskas, a Luciferian high priest and a Nazi, got his PhD in tropical medicine and specialized in sea-creature venoms.
"My recruitment as a MK-ULTRA lab rat began with my abuser Leonas Petrausaks, who was an expert in sea-creature poisons. Petrauskas earned a degree in tropical medicine in 1957."
Let us not forget that this 11,000 were the ones who left a paper trail.
How many people in government and health care really got the v@((*ne?
1. For those in government on TV how many of those shots were saline?
Does anyone really think that Fauci took that shot? Or Trump?
2. For those in health care how many simply walked out of the private room where it was administered with a band aide on their arm and a card with the lot number of the vial that ACCIDENTALLY got squirted into the trash can when the patient ACCIDENTALLY dropped money on the floor that the VACCINATOR picked up?
THE TRUTH IS THAT WE WILL NEVER KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN INJECTED ACTUALLY WERE. BUT WE DO KNOW THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE FRAIL ELDERLY IN NURSING HOMES GOT THE REAL THING.
The issue that I raised is that in order to know the percentage of people who took the shot died or had serious complications you need to know
1) how many reported problems and
2) how many got the shot.
3)You then calculate the % of people who had adverse outcome by the formula:
Morbidity & Mortality / Total number of people who took the shot. = % harmed
So if you had 20 reports of M&M and 100 got the shot, then M&M = 20%.
But if only 80 people actually took it 20/80 = 25% and is HIGHER than you thought.
IFTHE DENOMINATOR IS LOWER THAN IT REALLY WAS YOU WILL CALCULATE THAT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INJURED IS LESS THAN IT REALLY WAS.
Lot and or batch # does not come into play because ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE REPORTED AN INJURY WILL HAVE CAUSE TO IDENTIFY THOSE NUMBERS. No one is going to look for lot and or batch numbers on people who are OK.
I think genocide is associated with experimentation. We know that the injections of different batches contained different poisons in different doses. The manufacturers received the names of those to whom it was administered and the serial numbers of the injections. Manufacturers know which injection should have caused death or injury shortly after administration. I'm pretty sure they knew which one would cause a stroke, heart attack, or pericarditis, and which would cause the other. In other words, in this case, it doesn't matter whether the injury was reported or not, they know that there would have been so many deaths for x lot number. If it didn't happen to everyone, they might conclude that maybe you didn't actually get the injection.
Sorry if I'm not clear enough, I don't know English, I only write with a translator...
Maybe you should not comment because not only do you not write English you clearly don't seem to understand it either since that is going through a translator as well.
Scoops only included people under dose 1 if their newest dose listed in the dataset was dose 1. There's 71,396 people who had gotten a first dose by the end of July 2021, but only 1,082 them don't have any other doses listed later (who Scoops included in his plot but who are not representative of the total set of people who got the first dose).
A common reason why somebody didn't get further doses after dose 1 is that they died before they could get more doses. In a similar way people who drank their last cup of coffee in 2021 are more likely to have subsequently died than people who drank their last cup of coffee in 2024, because a common reason why someone would stop drinking coffee is that they died. But that doesn't mean that batches of coffee were deadlier in 2021.
I am not Mongol, but I will also answer. In the Philippines starting in March of 2021 there was a very sudden increase in excess deaths (after there having been lower than usual deaths in 2020). These excess deaths particularly accelerated in July to August of 2021, to give a total annual excess deaths of 43.2%. This excess is not even complete, because the government stopped compiling death data early! There was nothing at all that happened to explain such massive excess deaths, except the vaccine rollouts. I can also see that excess deaths increase in parallel with the vaccine dosing. The most notable products where a deaths inflection exactly follows the dosing were Coronavac (Chinese made product), and Janssen! Then the VAERS and other pharmacovigilance data, though massively under-reporting, also corroborates these findings of toxicity. The reports read: well person, jabbed, sick, dead. Some even read well person, jabbed, dead. Sudden acute death with NO explanation at all! Except the jab!
The Sovereign is represented in New Zealand by the Governor-General Rt Hon Dame Cindy Kiro. Was the New Zealand representative for King Charles III exempted from the injection? And was there someone else prior to Kiro from the beginning of the injections representing the Sovereign?
96% of the eligible population (12 years old and above) were persuaded and coerced into taking the injections. New Zealand was especially punitive towards those in the genera population refusing the jabs. Politicians of course had a get out of jail free card. The safe and effect propaganda continues, but this release of data must surely be one of the keystones in the dam wall that spells the end of this coverup. History will not look kindly on the events of the last 4 years.
The people of New Zealand now have a convenient list of 11,000 coconspirators in the vax genocide. Let us hope they use it wisely.
No wonder Ardern fled…
That maggots time will come!
So this is deaths broken down by vaccination status?
Yes, and with a convenient no doses control! Should be the permanent end of all things mRNA, if anyone was in their right mind.
Wow! I am surprised they were foolish enough to even collect this data, let alone not redact everything in the FOI!
Maybe the recently changed government in NZ is allowing this to come out! One of the countries that was most ravaged, has fallen the furtherest, is now showing the way!
ok, makes more sense then.
They wanted to know how successful the campaign was. They already know that people won't do anything against them anyway.
And to think there's still people who believe this sh1te
I'm a little confused. The FOI that sought vaccination history for those who were hospitalised, or died after the vaccination roll out has been denied by the NZ MOH. My own research using Stats NZ data shows an increase in deaths, using 2020 as the datum, for the months and years following the injection roll-out, in normally low death-rate months, the warmer months, but a reduction in death rates in the winter, following these higher death rate months. This makes sense as anyone can only die once..
Future maps of the world show New Zealand as one of the safe places in the coming pole shift/cataclysms. That's why so many Deep State have built bunkers there. That's why genociding the native Maori and other New Zealanders will allow for a massive land grab (no more descendants to claim ancestral or other titled lands).
If the spikes were simply the injections selecting old people already most likely to die, then you would expect the black unvaccinated line to mirror the coloured lines and go way below zero representing young people left who aren't susceptable to death. They don't. To me, the virtually horizontal black line is a major tell given the presence of the spikes.
All 11,000 should be held for or assisting murder, This is hypocrisy at the highest level.
Fiona Barnett says Leonas Petrauskas, a Luciferian high priest and a Nazi, got his PhD in tropical medicine and specialized in sea-creature venoms.
"My recruitment as a MK-ULTRA lab rat began with my abuser Leonas Petrausaks, who was an expert in sea-creature poisons. Petrauskas earned a degree in tropical medicine in 1957."
https://dianabarahona.substack.com/p/fiona-barnett-part-4
Let us not forget that this 11,000 were the ones who left a paper trail.
How many people in government and health care really got the v@((*ne?
1. For those in government on TV how many of those shots were saline?
Does anyone really think that Fauci took that shot? Or Trump?
2. For those in health care how many simply walked out of the private room where it was administered with a band aide on their arm and a card with the lot number of the vial that ACCIDENTALLY got squirted into the trash can when the patient ACCIDENTALLY dropped money on the floor that the VACCINATOR picked up?
THE TRUTH IS THAT WE WILL NEVER KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN INJECTED ACTUALLY WERE. BUT WE DO KNOW THAT NEARLY ALL OF THE FRAIL ELDERLY IN NURSING HOMES GOT THE REAL THING.
This can be traced based on the item number, since they know what the item should have caused if that person actually received it.
If only 68 people died out of 100 direct killers, then the other 32 will be found and punished for fraud...
What is the "item number" to which you are referring?
the lot number of the vial
The issue that I raised is that in order to know the percentage of people who took the shot died or had serious complications you need to know
1) how many reported problems and
2) how many got the shot.
3)You then calculate the % of people who had adverse outcome by the formula:
Morbidity & Mortality / Total number of people who took the shot. = % harmed
So if you had 20 reports of M&M and 100 got the shot, then M&M = 20%.
But if only 80 people actually took it 20/80 = 25% and is HIGHER than you thought.
IFTHE DENOMINATOR IS LOWER THAN IT REALLY WAS YOU WILL CALCULATE THAT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INJURED IS LESS THAN IT REALLY WAS.
Lot and or batch # does not come into play because ONLY THOSE WHO HAVE REPORTED AN INJURY WILL HAVE CAUSE TO IDENTIFY THOSE NUMBERS. No one is going to look for lot and or batch numbers on people who are OK.
I think genocide is associated with experimentation. We know that the injections of different batches contained different poisons in different doses. The manufacturers received the names of those to whom it was administered and the serial numbers of the injections. Manufacturers know which injection should have caused death or injury shortly after administration. I'm pretty sure they knew which one would cause a stroke, heart attack, or pericarditis, and which would cause the other. In other words, in this case, it doesn't matter whether the injury was reported or not, they know that there would have been so many deaths for x lot number. If it didn't happen to everyone, they might conclude that maybe you didn't actually get the injection.
Sorry if I'm not clear enough, I don't know English, I only write with a translator...
Maybe you should not comment because not only do you not write English you clearly don't seem to understand it either since that is going through a translator as well.
Scoops only included people under dose 1 if their newest dose listed in the dataset was dose 1. There's 71,396 people who had gotten a first dose by the end of July 2021, but only 1,082 them don't have any other doses listed later (who Scoops included in his plot but who are not representative of the total set of people who got the first dose).
A common reason why somebody didn't get further doses after dose 1 is that they died before they could get more doses. In a similar way people who drank their last cup of coffee in 2021 are more likely to have subsequently died than people who drank their last cup of coffee in 2024, because a common reason why someone would stop drinking coffee is that they died. But that doesn't mean that batches of coffee were deadlier in 2021.
When I calculated excess mortality so that I included all people who got dose 1 under the first dose, I got negative excess mortality for dose 1 in July 2021: https://twitter.com/mongol_fi/status/1758810595221016697.
Mongol, in your opinion does this data really show that these shots are extremely deadly? Im not great with numbers or charts. Thanks in advance.
I am not Mongol, but I will also answer. In the Philippines starting in March of 2021 there was a very sudden increase in excess deaths (after there having been lower than usual deaths in 2020). These excess deaths particularly accelerated in July to August of 2021, to give a total annual excess deaths of 43.2%. This excess is not even complete, because the government stopped compiling death data early! There was nothing at all that happened to explain such massive excess deaths, except the vaccine rollouts. I can also see that excess deaths increase in parallel with the vaccine dosing. The most notable products where a deaths inflection exactly follows the dosing were Coronavac (Chinese made product), and Janssen! Then the VAERS and other pharmacovigilance data, though massively under-reporting, also corroborates these findings of toxicity. The reports read: well person, jabbed, sick, dead. Some even read well person, jabbed, dead. Sudden acute death with NO explanation at all! Except the jab!
The Sovereign is represented in New Zealand by the Governor-General Rt Hon Dame Cindy Kiro. Was the New Zealand representative for King Charles III exempted from the injection? And was there someone else prior to Kiro from the beginning of the injections representing the Sovereign?