Deaths in March 2023 already exceed deaths in March of 2022. COD data shows big increases in Cardiovascular and Hypertensive Causes, Neoplasms are Trending Upwards.
I recently learned that the show The Peripheral said it took the elites 40 years to reduce the 7.5 billion useless eaters after they were jabbed, and 1 in 20 were left fertile. To me the 40-year waiting period to hit the Georgia Guidestones target of "500 million or less in perpetuity" makes the argument for a Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, etc to depopulate humanity. You already know I believe Ivermectin is one such option.
Hi Angie, I think I chatted with u briefly on Sally's messenger group. I also have questions about Ivermectin. I do believe though it kept people out of the hospital and away from Remdesevir and ventilators. Where does your research come from on this? Todd Truth? Wellness Superheroes at Lifeforce? Many are now talking about how it cures, cancer, etc. What do you think about this? I believe there have been examples where it shows how it has. Thanks.
Hey Phil. I believe I recall you from Sally's messenger group. If you back read or do a search you may be able to find the links I previously dropped there. The easiest information to digest will be TimTruth's videos or substack articles. I'll post a link to Tim's substack at the bottom of this reply. Kelsey and the rest of the Lifeforce team have great material on Ivermectin's dangers. If you can handle the density--- the OG researcher is Dmitry Kats, PhD. You can go to his website hom3ostasis.com or his Telegram group. Kelsey also has her own TG group and I'm part of that.
The crux of the argument is this:
Ivermectin degrades DNA at the cellular level. In a hamster ovary study, it tore apart the double strand helices of the mammalian DNA. That's the effect on a female ovarian cell in hamsters.
In human men, there's a Nigerian study where one dose of Ivermectin made their sperm immotile.
It is death by a thousand cuts, spread out over a generations-long timeline.
The argument "Where are all the dead Africans, if Ivermectin is so poisonous?" doesn't exactly hold water. The more accurate question is "Where are all the unborn Africans whose conceptions never occurred due to Ivermectin administration?".
Ivermectin appears to be safe and effective because its known adverse effect is when it crosses over into the blood-brain barrier.
The literature on serious adverse events (ataxia, coma, death) occur in white people who took Ivermectin and have a double copy of the MDR-1 gene inherited from both parents. They cannot produce enough detox proteins, called the P-Gp protein, to escort Ivermectin out of their brains.
Ivermectin also produces abnormal sperm (in addition to immotile sperm). Sperm with double heads. Sperm with overly long tails. Sperm with too-short tails, and so on.
I would not procreate with a pureblood man on Ivermectin. What if his double-headed sperm conceived with my pureblood egg? I do not wish to have genetically defective offspring if I can avoid it.
People who reproduce successfully and *appear* to have no negative effects from Ivermectin ingestion only go by external appearances. Who knows what level of DNA degradation occurred in the man or the woman's body during their Ivermectin ingestion? Some couples have been taking it 3 years as of 2023. The Africans taking it for onchoreasis have been taking annual doses since the late 70s.
DNA damage on the cellular level can be repaired by the body. But if you keep dosing yourself with poison on a weekly prophylactic basis, eventually the odds will no longer be stacked in your favor, either in your lifetime or in succeeding degraded copies of your genetic offspring.
Ivermectin is most dangerous to white people. It is second-most dangerous to Southeast Asians. There's a study on that too. It is least dangerous to African populations. The champions of IVM will not tell you the African safety data does not apply to white or Asian populations. They use a false human correlation and will not examine ethnic-specific data in Ivermectin poisoning, related to the population-wide presence of the MDR-1 genetic defect.
Look up why veterinarians will not administer Ivermectin to dogs without first ordering an MDR-1 genetic test.
Ask yourself why the standard of care is higher in veterinary medicine than in human Ivermectin administration.
Ask yourself why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the Ivermectin Road Map 2024.
You can read the data that tells you Ivermectin cures cancer. Or you can dig deeper as to why I keep telling people it's Plan B to depopulate vaccine refuseniks. Best of luck!
Thanks for the reply. I am quite familiar with mostly everything you said. That's why i stopped recommending it awhile ago. However, as I said in my previous comment, if you took it short term and made you feel better but most importantly kept you out of the hospital and being treated with remdesevir and ventilators, it was worth it.
True. I would tell someone to take Ivermectin if that's all they had available to them and they waited till the last minute to ask for help. Others--- I'd tell them to buy a nebulizer and food grade peroxide or CDS so they can use that if they feel short of breath.
Ivermectin and HCQ will be hyped again in whatever they decide will be the disease du jour of the next pandemic.
Be great if you started telling people Ivermectin is poison, instead of just stopping recommending it. But if you're not there yet, it's fine. I'm sure you saw how NICE and WELL BEHAVED the others in the group were to me whenever I spoke about Ivermectin's dangers. Proof that you can't buy class, even if you were born to affluence.
I actually had posted a video from one of your sources on a chat group with which I had minimal participation. I did so without an opinion attached. I was subsequently banned from that group. BTW, I didn't like the way they treated you in that group. There shud always be an open forum for discussion.
I recently learned that the show The Peripheral said it took the elites 40 years to reduce the 7.5 billion useless eaters after they were jabbed, and 1 in 20 were left fertile. To me the 40-year waiting period to hit the Georgia Guidestones target of "500 million or less in perpetuity" makes the argument for a Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, etc to depopulate humanity. You already know I believe Ivermectin is one such option.
Hi Angie, I think I chatted with u briefly on Sally's messenger group. I also have questions about Ivermectin. I do believe though it kept people out of the hospital and away from Remdesevir and ventilators. Where does your research come from on this? Todd Truth? Wellness Superheroes at Lifeforce? Many are now talking about how it cures, cancer, etc. What do you think about this? I believe there have been examples where it shows how it has. Thanks.
Hey Phil. I believe I recall you from Sally's messenger group. If you back read or do a search you may be able to find the links I previously dropped there. The easiest information to digest will be TimTruth's videos or substack articles. I'll post a link to Tim's substack at the bottom of this reply. Kelsey and the rest of the Lifeforce team have great material on Ivermectin's dangers. If you can handle the density--- the OG researcher is Dmitry Kats, PhD. You can go to his website hom3ostasis.com or his Telegram group. Kelsey also has her own TG group and I'm part of that.
The crux of the argument is this:
Ivermectin degrades DNA at the cellular level. In a hamster ovary study, it tore apart the double strand helices of the mammalian DNA. That's the effect on a female ovarian cell in hamsters.
In human men, there's a Nigerian study where one dose of Ivermectin made their sperm immotile.
It is death by a thousand cuts, spread out over a generations-long timeline.
The argument "Where are all the dead Africans, if Ivermectin is so poisonous?" doesn't exactly hold water. The more accurate question is "Where are all the unborn Africans whose conceptions never occurred due to Ivermectin administration?".
Ivermectin appears to be safe and effective because its known adverse effect is when it crosses over into the blood-brain barrier.
The literature on serious adverse events (ataxia, coma, death) occur in white people who took Ivermectin and have a double copy of the MDR-1 gene inherited from both parents. They cannot produce enough detox proteins, called the P-Gp protein, to escort Ivermectin out of their brains.
Ivermectin also produces abnormal sperm (in addition to immotile sperm). Sperm with double heads. Sperm with overly long tails. Sperm with too-short tails, and so on.
I would not procreate with a pureblood man on Ivermectin. What if his double-headed sperm conceived with my pureblood egg? I do not wish to have genetically defective offspring if I can avoid it.
People who reproduce successfully and *appear* to have no negative effects from Ivermectin ingestion only go by external appearances. Who knows what level of DNA degradation occurred in the man or the woman's body during their Ivermectin ingestion? Some couples have been taking it 3 years as of 2023. The Africans taking it for onchoreasis have been taking annual doses since the late 70s.
DNA damage on the cellular level can be repaired by the body. But if you keep dosing yourself with poison on a weekly prophylactic basis, eventually the odds will no longer be stacked in your favor, either in your lifetime or in succeeding degraded copies of your genetic offspring.
Ivermectin is most dangerous to white people. It is second-most dangerous to Southeast Asians. There's a study on that too. It is least dangerous to African populations. The champions of IVM will not tell you the African safety data does not apply to white or Asian populations. They use a false human correlation and will not examine ethnic-specific data in Ivermectin poisoning, related to the population-wide presence of the MDR-1 genetic defect.
Look up why veterinarians will not administer Ivermectin to dogs without first ordering an MDR-1 genetic test.
Ask yourself why the standard of care is higher in veterinary medicine than in human Ivermectin administration.
Ask yourself why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the Ivermectin Road Map 2024.
You can read the data that tells you Ivermectin cures cancer. Or you can dig deeper as to why I keep telling people it's Plan B to depopulate vaccine refuseniks. Best of luck!
https://timtruth.substack.com/p/ivermectin-vs-sperm-3-disturbing
https://hom3ostasis.com/
https://bohemiaconsortium.org/a-roadmap-for-adding-ivermectin-to-the-malaria-toolbox/
Thanks for the reply. I am quite familiar with mostly everything you said. That's why i stopped recommending it awhile ago. However, as I said in my previous comment, if you took it short term and made you feel better but most importantly kept you out of the hospital and being treated with remdesevir and ventilators, it was worth it.
True. I would tell someone to take Ivermectin if that's all they had available to them and they waited till the last minute to ask for help. Others--- I'd tell them to buy a nebulizer and food grade peroxide or CDS so they can use that if they feel short of breath.
Ivermectin and HCQ will be hyped again in whatever they decide will be the disease du jour of the next pandemic.
Be great if you started telling people Ivermectin is poison, instead of just stopping recommending it. But if you're not there yet, it's fine. I'm sure you saw how NICE and WELL BEHAVED the others in the group were to me whenever I spoke about Ivermectin's dangers. Proof that you can't buy class, even if you were born to affluence.
I actually had posted a video from one of your sources on a chat group with which I had minimal participation. I did so without an opinion attached. I was subsequently banned from that group. BTW, I didn't like the way they treated you in that group. There shud always be an open forum for discussion.