Why Does Lancet Say Less than 1% of V-Safe Participants Required Medical Assistance When the ICAN Dashboard and FOI Data Released Shows 7.7% of Participants Sought Medical Assistance?
Why Does Lancet Say Less than 1% of V-Safe Participants Required Medical Assistance When the ICAN Dashboard and FOI Data Released Shows 7.7% of Participants Sought Medical Assistance?
7th March 2022 Lancet paper reported that less than 1% of V-Safe Participants sought medical care? Should this paper be revisited in the light of this data reveal?
I have forwarded to Dr. Rose, ICAN Whistle Blower, Jen Margulis, Dr. Lyons-Weiler. Between those esteemed parties I would hope that a proper review and necessary actions will be taken. Lancet is supposed to be THE Premier Medical Journal! The article should have been peer reviewed. Could this have been a genuine mistake by the researchers?????? Why would I even question??????
good eyes! the vaers numbers they cite are also suspiciously low. you should talk to jessica rose about this
I have forwarded to Dr. Rose, ICAN Whistle Blower, Jen Margulis, Dr. Lyons-Weiler. Between those esteemed parties I would hope that a proper review and necessary actions will be taken. Lancet is supposed to be THE Premier Medical Journal! The article should have been peer reviewed. Could this have been a genuine mistake by the researchers?????? Why would I even question??????
Get a load of this gang! They're are not afraid to lay on the BS thick and fast.
So many inaccuracies:
https://archive.ph/2022.10.05-103625/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/antivaxers-are-a-global-menace-who-must-be-defeated-683zlbzwj
Wow, stunning piece of misinformation. Would be reassuring to some.
Should they be reported for misinformation and putting people's lives at risk?
I would like to think.so. Forwarded to a few people whom I hope can call this out.