After no excess deaths in 2020, every single province showed similar patterns of excess deaths starting in March/April and increasing as the year progressed. End of year data is incomplete.
When will the DOH take a close look at their data? Hopefully sooner... If only the DOH reads Super Sally's substack, they will become wiser in no time.
Sadly, they are dependent on another agency/department on this.
Within the last 2 years, other countries have immediately provided excess death information - real time for some. If the DOH use MBA M1s, it's for MS Office applications and Adobe Reader DC Free version. Pun intended.
I believe the DICT Secretary is more than willing to help but someone from the DOH [or anybody from the Government's side (BBM?)] need to tie together what information is required. Duque never had a clue despite WHO Emergency preparedness trainings for pandemics. Denmark had the IQ of foregoing C19 mRNA drug injections for kids - no benefit. Until the WHO says so, the DOH will not budge.
If you open up an FOI, you will be provided an excuse as to why there is no outing on excess death data.
If you can reach out to your local representatives and members of the Senate, email them, give them a call. Have 50 of your friends do the same. ;)
Good suggestion. All of us who are aware should be writing or calling the authorities. Will the Senate take the time or just ignore the pleas to look at the DOH data? Two reasons to guess the outcome: 1. The excess deaths are not as "controversial" as in the case of human rights violations that former Pres. Duterte was accused of. 2. There's no authority who is a Filipino that can defend the excess deaths conclusion. Will the Senate summon Sally, an Australian, for a Senate inquiry?
There are a team of Filipino doctors, lawyers, and concerned citizens who are working to provide some alternative approaches than those currently used. They are familiar with my work and the source materials. They have used some of it in the materials submitted for the supreme court case that was filed last April. The respondents are required to respond by next week (19th, I believe) - they were given a non-extendable 30 days to respond. We shall see. I am just a background data geek. Hope what I am doing can be useful!
When will the DOH take a close look at their data? Hopefully sooner... If only the DOH reads Super Sally's substack, they will become wiser in no time.
Sadly, they are dependent on another agency/department on this.
Within the last 2 years, other countries have immediately provided excess death information - real time for some. If the DOH use MBA M1s, it's for MS Office applications and Adobe Reader DC Free version. Pun intended.
I believe the DICT Secretary is more than willing to help but someone from the DOH [or anybody from the Government's side (BBM?)] need to tie together what information is required. Duque never had a clue despite WHO Emergency preparedness trainings for pandemics. Denmark had the IQ of foregoing C19 mRNA drug injections for kids - no benefit. Until the WHO says so, the DOH will not budge.
If you open up an FOI, you will be provided an excuse as to why there is no outing on excess death data.
If you can reach out to your local representatives and members of the Senate, email them, give them a call. Have 50 of your friends do the same. ;)
Good suggestion. All of us who are aware should be writing or calling the authorities. Will the Senate take the time or just ignore the pleas to look at the DOH data? Two reasons to guess the outcome: 1. The excess deaths are not as "controversial" as in the case of human rights violations that former Pres. Duterte was accused of. 2. There's no authority who is a Filipino that can defend the excess deaths conclusion. Will the Senate summon Sally, an Australian, for a Senate inquiry?
There are a team of Filipino doctors, lawyers, and concerned citizens who are working to provide some alternative approaches than those currently used. They are familiar with my work and the source materials. They have used some of it in the materials submitted for the supreme court case that was filed last April. The respondents are required to respond by next week (19th, I believe) - they were given a non-extendable 30 days to respond. We shall see. I am just a background data geek. Hope what I am doing can be useful!